Original Research
Socio-economic status and health care utilization in rural Zimbabwe: findings from Project Accept (HPTN 043)
Journal of Public Health in Africa | Vol 3, No 1 | a1096 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2012.e13
| © 2024 Sebastian Kevany, Oliver Murima, Basant Singh, Daniel Hlubinka, Michal Kulich, Stephen F. Morin, Michael Sweat
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 28 November 2024 | Published: 07 March 2012
Submitted: 28 November 2024 | Published: 07 March 2012
About the author(s)
Sebastian Kevany, Institute for Global Health, University of California, San Francisco, United StatesOliver Murima, Institute for Global Health, University of California, San Francisco, United States
Basant Singh, Institute for Global Health, University of California, San Francisco, United States
Daniel Hlubinka, Institute for Global Health, University of California, San Francisco, United States
Michal Kulich, UInstitute for Global Health, University of California, San Francisco, United States
Stephen F. Morin, Institute for Global Health, University of California, San Francisco, United States
Michael Sweat, Institute for Global Health, University of California, San Francisco, United States
Full Text:
PDF (387KB)Abstract
Zimbabwe’s HIV epidemic is amongst the worst in the world, and disproportionately effects poorer rural areas. Access to almost all health services in Zimbabwe includes some form of cost to the client. In recent years, the socio-economic and employment status of many Zimbabweans has suffered a serious decline, creating additional barriers to HIV treatment and care. We aimed to assess the impact of i) socio-economic status (SES) and ii) employment status on the utilization of health services in rural Zimbabwe. Data were collected from a random probability sample household survey conducted in the Mutoko district of north-western Zimbabwe in 2005. We selected variables that described the economic status of the respondent, including: being paid to work, employment status, and SES by assets. Respondents were also asked about where they most often utilized healthcare when they or their family was sick or hurt. Of 2,874 respondents, all forms of healthcare tended to be utilized by those of high or medium-high SES (65%), including private (65%), church-based (61%), traditional (67%), and other providers (66%) (P=0.009). Most respondents of low SES utilized government providers (74%) (P=0.009). Seventy-one percent of respondents utilizing health services were employed. Government (71%), private (72%), church (71%), community-based (78%) and other (64%) health services tended to be utilized by employed respondents (P=0.000). Only traditional health services were equally utilized by unemployed respondents (50%) (P=0.000). A wide range of health providers are utilized in rural Zimbabwe. Utilization is strongly associated with SES and employment status, particularly for services with user fees, which may act as a barrier to HIV treatment and care access. Efforts to improve access in low-SES, high HIVprevalence settings may benefit from the subsidization of the health care payment system, efforts to improve SES levels, political reform, and the involvement of traditional providers.
Keywords
Africa; socio-economic status; HIV/AIDS; access
Metrics
Total abstract views: 364Total article views: 91
Crossref Citations
1. Promoting equality in utilization of basic public health services in China: the role of the family doctor contract service
Sha Lai, Yawei Huang, Xiaolong Zhang, Zechen Wang, Junfei Feng, Zhongliang Zhou, Chi Shen, Li Lu
Journal of Medical Economics vol: 27 issue: 1 first page: 1444 year: 2024
doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2421115