About the Author(s)


Miriam Nanyunja symbol
World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Emergency Preparedness and Response Hub, Nairobi, Kenya

Viviane Fossouo symbol
World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Emergency Preparedness and Response Hub, Nairobi, Kenya

Ebenezer Obi Daniel symbol
World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Emergency Preparedness and Response Hub, Nairobi, Kenya

Joseph C. Okeibunor Email symbol
World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Emergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, Brazzaville, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Samuel Boland symbol
World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Emergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, Brazzaville, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Hilary K. Njenge symbol
World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Emergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, Brazzaville, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Brice W. Bicaba symbol
Africa Centre for Disease Control Headquarters, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Otim P.C. Ramadan symbol
World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Emergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, Brazzaville, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Solomon F. Woldetsadik symbol
World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Emergency Preparedness and Response Hub, Nairobi, Kenya

Dick D. Chamla symbol
World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Emergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, Brazzaville, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Fiona Braka symbol
World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Emergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, Brazzaville, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Abdou S. Gueye symbol
World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Emergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, Brazzaville, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Citation


Nanyunja M, Fossouo V, Daniel EO, et al. Ensuring the continuity of essential health services during mpox response in the African region. J Public Health Africa. 2025;16(1), a1227. https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v16i1.1227

Note: The manuscript is a contribution to the themed collection titled ‘Mpox and Marburg Emergency Preparedness and Response in Africa,’ under the expert guidance of guest editor Prof. Nicaise Ndembi.

Editorial

Ensuring the continuity of essential health services during mpox response in the African region

Miriam Nanyunja, Viviane Fossouo, Ebenezer Obi Daniel, Joseph C. Okeibunor, Samuel Boland, Hilary K. Njenge, Brice W. Bicaba, Otim P.C. Ramadan, Solomon F. Woldetsadik, Dick D. Chamla, Fiona Braka, Abdou S. Gueye

Copyright: © 2025. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

The mpox epidemic across the World Health Organization (WHO) African Regions highlights the critical need for concerted efforts to ensure the continuity of essential health services (CEHS) during health emergencies.1 These services include immunisation, reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health (RMNCH) care, the management of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), and the treatment of chronic infectious diseases such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis.2 Disruptions of these services during emergencies have significant long-term effects on health outcomes, increasing the vulnerability of populations and compounding existing challenges. Public health stakeholders in the WHO African Region must assess the maintenance of CEHS during emergencies and initiate corrective measures early to strengthen health systems’ resilience.

Lessons from the past: Ebola and COVID-19

The 2014–2016 West Africa Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak exposed significant weaknesses in the health systems of affected countries.3 The crisis underscored the importance of robust health system pillars, community engagement and strong institutional leadership. Because of the absence of these elements, many countries experienced disruptions in CEHS, which is reflected in poor performance on relevant indicators. For example, human resources for health, a key driver of CEHS, were severely impacted, with high healthcare worker mortalities in Sierra Leone, Guinea and Liberia. Additional issues included poor health information management, inadequate availability of medicines, weak governance and insufficient health financing, all of which slowed the response to the outbreak.4

The COVID-19 pandemic presented even greater challenges, particularly for countries with weak health systems. Efforts to curb the disease significantly disrupted CEHS, negatively affecting economic stability and biopsychosocial well-being. While the African region reported fewer cases and deaths than other regions, the pandemic’s impact was still substantial. Preparedness levels before the pandemic were crucial in determining the ability to maintain CEHS. However, by 2018, many countries were unprepared for outbreaks with pandemic potential, with only 32.6% of Member States in the WHO African Region demonstrating the capacity to maintain CEHS and just 6% of these countries were classified as fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable.5

A global assessment of COVID-19 preparedness and response plans across 106 countries revealed that most prioritised disease surveillance (99%), laboratory testing (96%) and COVID-19 case management (97%). However, only 47% considered CEHS planning, 34% addressed sub-national continuity of health service delivery, 24% ensured the quality of care, and 7% had a monitoring and evaluation plan for CEHS.6 Fear of contracting COVID-19 deterred non-COVID-19 patients, particularly those with comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes and tuberculosis, from seeking care, and worsening clinical outcomes also impacted CEHS during the pandemic.7,8 Health worker redeployment to pandemic response efforts further reduced the availability of CEHS for these patients, potentially increasing non-COVID-19 attributable deaths.9,10 These findings highlight the need for prioritising primary healthcare as part of emergency preparedness and response strategies.

Maintaining continuity of essential health services during the mpox response

In the context of the ongoing mpox epidemic, a desk review was conducted to assess preparedness and response plans in 14 Member States. The review focused on five key areas: inclusion of a CEHS pillar, CEHS-related objectives, activities to ensure CEHS, budgetary allocations and indicators for monitoring CEHS. Only four countries (28.5%) integrated CEHS considerations into their plans, with significant budget allocations and monitoring indicators gaps. Building on lessons from past outbreaks for maintaining CEHS during the mpox response requires strategic and integrated approaches to minimise disruptions while effectively managing the outbreak.11

Key strategies include comprehensive planning, which entails developing integrated strategies for maintaining CEHS, tailored to varying mpox prevalence across countries; integrating mpox response activities with routine healthcare services, including RMNCH, immunisation programmes, and care for NCD patients; increasing the number of healthcare workers in infectious disease clinics by providing focused training and implementing standard referral systems and mobilise alternative workforces, including retirees and students from learning institutions, in high-prevalence areas.12,13 Community engagement and communication demand attention. This will address fear among non-mpox patients by conducting public health campaigns that communicate safety measures at health facilities; engage community leaders and organisations to disseminate preventive guidelines and maintain trust in health services and equip community health workers to provide home care for non-critical mpox cases, reducing the burden on healthcare facilities.14,15,16,17,18,19

Strengthening surveillance and data systems is critical for implementing real-time data collection and monitoring of mpox cases and CEHS utilisation to ensure efficient resource allocation. Leveraging digital health technologies will facilitate case tracking, resource management and workforce optimisation. Adopting data-driven approaches will enhance the resilience of health systems during the mpox response and future emergencies.20,21

Conclusion

The mpox epidemic underscores the importance of learning from past outbreaks to prevent disruptions in CEHS. Despite progress in essential medicine supply chains, digital health technologies and health system resilience, significant gaps remain. Governments and public health partners in the WHO African region must integrate CEHS strategies into emergency response plans, supported by adequate funding and infrastructure investments. Strengthening community engagement and health system infrastructure is vital to protect routine health services during emergencies. Implementing these measures will mitigate the long-term impacts of infectious disease outbreaks and improve health outcomes for African populations.

References

  1. Kabwama SN, Wanyenze RK, Kiwanuka SN, et al. Interventions for maintenance of essential health service delivery during the COVID-19 response in Uganda, between March 2020 and April 2021. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(19):12522. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912522
  2. Monekosso GL. Essential health care: A framework for its definition and implementation in health districts. Trop Doct. 1984;14(4):146–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/004947558401400402
  3. Cancedda C, Sheila MD, Kerry L, et al. Strengthening health systems while responding to a health crisis: Lessons learned by a nongovernmental organization during the Ebola virus disease epidemic in Sierra Leone. J Infect Dis. 2016; 214(suppl_3):S153–S163. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw345
  4. Shoman H, Karafillakis E, Rawaf S. The link between the West African Ebola outbreak and health systems in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone: A systematic review. Glob Health. 2017;13:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0224-2
  5. WHO. Electronic IHR states parties self-assessment annual reporting tool [homepage on the Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://extranet.who.int/e-spar/.
  6. Mustafa S, Zhang Y, Zibwowa Z, et al. COVID-19 preparedness and response plans from 106 countries: A review from a health systems resilience perspective. Health Policy Plan. 2022;37(2):255–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab089
  7. Sanya RE, Karugu CH, Binyaruka P, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on type 2 diabetes care and factors associated with care disruption in Kenya and Tanzania. Glob Health Action. 2024;17(1):2345970. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2345970
  8. Thekkur P, Tweya H, Phiri S, et al. Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on TB and HIV programme services in selected health facilities in Lilongwe, Malawi: Operational research in real time. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2021;6(2):81. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed6020081
  9. Vera San Juan N, Clark SE, Camilleri M, et al. Training and redeployment of healthcare workers to intensive care units (ICUs) during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e050038. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050038
  10. Ahmat A, Okoroafor SC, Asamani JA, et al. Health workforce strategies during COVID-19 response: Insights from 15 countries in the WHO Africa region. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24:470. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10942-z
  11. Stachteas P, Symvoulakis M, Tsapas A, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of patients with chronic diseases in primary health care. Popul Med. 2022;4:23. https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/152606
  12. UNHCR. Integrating non-communicable disease care in humanitarian settings [homepage on the Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/legacy-pdf/5fb537094.pdf
  13. Bonet M, Babinska M, Buekens P, et al. Maternal and perinatal health research during emerging and ongoing epidemic threats: A landscape analysis and expert consultation. BMJ Glob Health. 2024;9(3):e014393. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014393
  14. McQuilkin PA, Udhayashankar K, Niescierenko M, et al. Health-care access during the Ebola virus epidemic in Liberia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;97(3):931–936. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0702
  15. Chippaux JP. COVID-19 impacts on healthcare access in sub-Saharan Africa: An overview. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2023;29:e20230002. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9199-jvatitd-2023-0002
  16. Garg S, Basu S, Rustagi R, et al. Primary health care facility preparedness for outpatient service provision during the COVID-19 pandemic in India: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(2):e19927. https://doi.org/10.2196/19927
  17. Monaghesh E, Hajizadeh A. The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: A systematic review based on current evidence. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1193. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09301-4
  18. Zhang Y, Tambo E, Djuikoue IC, et al. Early-stage risk communication and community engagement (RCCE) strategies and measures against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic crisis. Glob Health J. 2021;5(1):44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glohj.2021.02.009
  19. Afshari P, Beheshti-Nasab M, Maraghi E, Sadeghi S, Sanjari N, Zarea K. Home care in COVID-19 patients with the home-quarantined condition: A study from Iran. Front Public Health. 2022;10:952618. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.952618
  20. Nsubuga P, Nwanyanwu O, Nkengasong JN, et al. Strengthening public health surveillance and response using the health systems strengthening agenda in developing countries. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10(suppl 1):S5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-S1-S5
  21. Ernest O, Tivani PM-T. Mobile health applications for disease screening and treatment support in low-and middle-income countries: A narrative review. Heliyon. 2021; 7(3):e06639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06639


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.