About the Author(s)


Nongiwe L. Mhlanga Email symbol
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa

Sikhumbuzo A. Mabunda symbol
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa

School of Public Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

The George Institute of Public Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Citation


Mhlanga NL, Mabunda SA. Challenges in non-communicable disease mitigation among community health workers: A scoping review. J Public Health Africa. 2025;16(1), a1494. https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v16i1.1494

Note: Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article as Online Appendix 1, Online Appendix 2, and Online Appendix 3.

Review Article

Challenges in non-communicable disease mitigation among community health workers: A scoping review

Nongiwe L. Mhlanga, Sikhumbuzo A. Mabunda

Received: 30 May 2025; Accepted: 19 Sept. 2025; Published: 31 Oct. 2025

Copyright: © 2025. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Abstract

Background: There is an increase in non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Africa, amid a high health worker shortage, necessitating task-sharing with community health workers (CHWs). However, task sharing with CHWs may not have positive patient outcomes, as they face several challenges.

Aim: To describe the task-sharing challenges faced by CHWs in NCDs mitigation.

Setting: Studies conducted in Africa were selected.

Method: The Arksey and O’ Marley Framework was used. Included articles were published in English from 2015 to 2025. PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were searched from 26 March 2025. Two reviewers used Covidence to select studies, and conflicts were resolved through discussions. The researchers developed the data extraction tool and used content analysis to analyse data.

Results: Articles screened by title were 189, with a final selection of 14 articles. The review found that an individual-level challenge was a lack of skills and inadequate knowledge. Organization-level challenges included a lack of supervision, a lack of equipment and infrastructure, and a poor referral system. Community-level challenges included safety concerns, poverty among community members, lack of transport, and mistrust of community health workers.

Conclusion: It is essential to capacitate CHWs through continued supervision and training, and with policies that address broader socio-economic challenges like poverty and crime in Africa.

Contribution: The study contributes to increasing the efficiency of the African CHWs by providing insights into the challenges they experience so that these challenges may be addressed.

Keywords: task-sharing; community health workers; non-communicable diseases; Africa; challenges; health workforce.

Introduction

The non-communicable disease (NCD) burden poses a significant public health challenge, accounting for more than 82% of all premature deaths in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).1 The highest risk of premature deaths from NCDs is in sub-Saharan Africa.2 Worsening this problem is a shortage of health workers to manage and prevent NCDs. By 2022, it was estimated that health workers would cover only 43% of Africa’s population’s health service needs.3 To curb the burden, the World Health Organization describes the use of task-sharing to increase the capacity and efficiency of the health workforce.4 Although task-sharing offers a solution to manage NCDs, there is evidence highlighting challenges such as the complexity of tasks faced by community health workers (CHWs), which may affect patient outcomes in NCD mitigation. Therefore, this review sought to describe the task-sharing challenges faced by CHWs in NCD mitigation in Africa.

In Africa, CHWs form an integral part of health service delivery and have aided other initiatives such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care.5,6,7 Community health workers are non-professional health workers who have received less formal education and training than professional health workers and work voluntarily or for a stipend while residing in the communities they serve.8,9 Community health workers may also be referred to as lay health workers.10,11,12 or village health workers,13 and in this study are referred to as CHWs. The persistent challenge of health worker shortages, with consequent pertinence to implement task-sharing or task-shifting, has resulted in the growing recognition of the work performed by CHWs.14 Task-sharing refers to the distribution of tasks to health workers with lesser duration of training and qualifications to maximise the health workforce, with these delegated tasks being performed collaboratively.15

Previous systematic reviews have shown that tasks shared with CHWs include the management and screening for hypertension,16 diabetes health education, screening, support and advocacy.9,17 Regarding mental health service provision, CHWs in Malawi have also delivered psychosocial interventions for severe and common mental health conditions.18 In some cases, interventions for managing NCDs have resulted in better patient outcomes than the usual care provided by professional health workers. For example, in Zimbabwe, a psychosocial intervention delivered by CHWs resulted in improved symptoms compared with usual care.19 On the other hand, a South African randomised controlled trial reported that task-sharing in providing mental healthcare for antenatal depression was not effective.20 Given the poor patient outcomes reported in the South African study, while also recognising that positive patient outcomes do not mean that there are no challenges experienced, it is imperative to describe the challenges experienced in NCD mitigation service provision.

In some LMICs, comparable to Africa, some challenges include health policy-related issues, such as a lack of standardised training and government support,21,22 or institutional factors such as inadequate guidance reported in an Indonesian study.23 Moreover, there could be personal challenges experienced by the CHWs, such as resistance from family and a lack of competency because of inadequate training and knowledge.24,25 Despite this, CHWs still contribute to the overall management of NCDs, and it is important to understand and address these challenges to improve patient outcomes and facilitate the capacitation of health workers. Describing these challenges also enables the development of policies and improves the functioning of health systems for mitigating the adverse outcomes of NCDs.

Past scoping reviews have outlined the barriers and enablers faced by CHWs in managing mental health conditions in all countries,24 and there is also evidence from studies conducted outside Africa.25 However, there remains a gap in the evidence synthesis from Africa, which is faced with an increasing burden of NCDs and a shortage of health workers. Therefore, the scoping review question was: What are the task-sharing challenges faced by CHWs in NCD mitigation in Africa? Secondary research questions were: in what contexts do CHWs face task-sharing challenges in NCD mitigation in Africa, and what are the characteristics of CHWs facing task-sharing challenges in NCD mitigation? Before conducting this scoping review, a preliminary search of the databases, ScienceDirect and PubMed was conducted, and no similar topic was found. A scoping review, rather than a systematic review, was selected because the authors sought to clarify a concept, ‘challenges experienced by CHWs in Africa in NCD mitigation’, and not provide evidence for a clinical question.26 The protocol for this scoping review was registered on the Open Science Framework, registration number https://osf.io/rmgns/.

Methods

The Arksey and O’Malley Framework for conducting scoping reviews was used.27,28 The study was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).29

Eligibility criteria

The review’s eligibility criteria were developed using the Population, Concept and Context (PCC) framework.

Inclusion criteria:

  • Population: The population of interest in this study was CHWs who shared tasks in mitigating NCDs.
  • Context: The included studies described African settings or communities (urban, rural, peri-urban) where CHWs provided NCD mitigation services.
  • Concept: The review included studies that described the challenges in task-sharing faced by CHWs in the mitigation of NCDs.

Types of articles included:

  • Articles published between 2015 and 2025 to maintain the significance of the findings.
  • Articles published in English to minimise translation bias.
  • Peer-reviewed studies that used any study design, such as systematic reviews, qualitative studies, quantitative studies and mixed methods designs.

Types of articles excluded:

  • Institutional reports and grey literature were excluded because of difficulties in assessing the quality of the reports and as some of the grey literature may not have been based on empirical studies.
  • Systematic reviews that included studies outside Africa.
  • Articles not published in English to minimise translation bias.
Literature search

A three-step process was used to select studies.27,28 Three databases, such as PubMed, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar (first 10 pages), were searched. These databases were selected as they have been previously used in other African systematic reviews.30,31 The search was conducted using the key terms ‘task-sharing’, ‘community health workers’, ‘challenges’, ‘non-communicable diseases’ and ‘Africa’. After the relevant articles were identified, the index terms were used to develop a search strategy for the databases. The database search was conducted on 26 March 2025. The Boolean operators used were ‘OR’ and ‘AND’. The full search strategies for all three databases are included in Online Appendix 1. The reference lists of the selected articles were also searched for relevant studies.

Selection of studies

The references of the identified studies were uploaded to the Mendeley reference manager, and duplicates were removed. Titles and abstracts were then screened by two reviewers, N.L.M. and N.F. Screening was performed using Covidence, whereby potential studies and their full texts were screened against the eligibility criteria. During screening, reasons for exclusion were noted. Disagreements between the reviewers were resolved through discussion. The PRISMA chart was used to show the decision process.32

Data extraction

Data were extracted from selected articles by two reviewers using a data extraction tool developed by the reviewers. The data extracted included the title of the study, year of publication, country where the study was conducted, objectives of the study, study design, sample size and outcomes in relation to the review. The data extraction tool is included as Online Appendix 2.

Quality appraisal of the selected studies

The selected studies were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists. Although the Arksey and O’Malley Framework does not require the appraisal of selected studies for inclusion, the researchers deemed it necessary to appraise the studies. Two checklists were used, and these were for qualitative studies33 and cross-sectional studies.34 The reviewers, N.L.M. and N.F., appraised the studies independently, and any disagreements were discussed. The CASP checklists broadly assessed the validity of the results, results and the usefulness of the results. The overall decision would be negative (poor methodology) or positive (sound methodology).

Data analysis

A numeric analysis was first conducted of the selected studies. To answer the research questions, qualitative content analysis was used to analyse data independently by two researchers. Four steps outlined by Kleinheksel et al.35 were used. The first step was identifying the unit of meaning aligned with the main study objective. The second step was labelling similar units with a code. The third step was grouping the codes into a category, and lastly (the fourth step), the categories were organised as themes.

Review findings

Search results

A total of 189 articles were screened by title only, of which 137 did not meet the inclusion criteria, and 7 could not be retrieved. As such, 45 articles were screened by title and abstract. After screening, 14 articles were selected. Figure 1 shows the PRISMA flow chart of the decision process.

FIGURE 1: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses flow chart.

Results from the quality appraisal

All the 11 studies assessed using the CASP qualitative checklist had an overall appraisal summary of positive methodological quality. The most common unreported item in the qualitative studies was the relationship between participants and researchers. The two studies that used a mixed methods design were assessed using the CASP cross-sectional and qualitative checklists. The overall appraisal decision for both studies was ‘positive’. One study was assessed using the CASP checklist for cross-sectional studies, and the overall decision was also positive. The outcomes of the quality appraisal are included as Online Appendix 3.

Characteristics of the selected studies

Fourteen (n = 14) studies were included in the review. Most (28.6%, n = 4) studies were from South Africa, three (21.4%) studies from Uganda, two (14.3%) studies from Nigeria and one (7.1%) study each from Kenya, Zimbabwe, Mozambique and Ethiopia. One (7.1%) study reported findings from South Africa, Mexico, Bangladesh and Guatemala. Selected studies were published between 2015 and 2024, with most (four each) being published in 2023 and 2022. Eleven (78.6%) studies used a qualitative approach, while two studies used mixed methods and one used a quantitative approach. Nine (64.3%) studies focused on mental health, while other studies reported on hypertension (7.1%), diabetes and hypertension (7.1%), cardiovascular diseases (7.1%), all NCDs (7.1%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (7.1%). Table 1 summarises the characteristics of the selected studies.

TABLE 1: Summary of selected studies.
Contexts in which community health workers faced challenges in non-communicable disease mitigation service provision

The studies reviewed described the contexts in which CHWs experienced challenges. In most studies, CHWs experienced challenges while working in rural areas.39,42,44,48 In some studies, the challenges were experienced in peri-urban communities.36,40 One study was conducted in both rural and urban settings.46 Additionally, some studies named the study sites: one study37 was conducted in four states in Northern and Southern Nigeria, and another study38 was conducted in South-West Ugandan schools, while another study was conducted in Mbarara District, Uganda.43 Munodawafa et al.45 and Selohilwe et al.47 conducted their studies in South Africa; Khayelitsha, Cape Town and Kenneth Kaunda District, respectively. One study described the study setting as a low socio-economic area.41

Characteristics of community health workers facing task-sharing challenges in mitigating non-communicable diseases

The studies reviewed described the socio-demographic characteristics of CHWs who experienced challenges in task-sharing for NCD mitigation. In most studies,36,37,38,41,42,43,46,48 the CHWs who participated were female. In one Mozambican study,39 more male CHWs participated, while in another study,49 there was an equal proportion of male and female participants.

Concerning the level of education of the CHWs, four studies39,40,43,45 reported that CHWs had completed high school education. In some studies, CHWs had some high school education, such as Abrahams-Gessel et al.36 who noted that the minimum level of education was Grade 8, while Wall et al.49 note that 45.0% of the CHWs had some high school education. In one rural Ugandan study,42 most (70.0%) CHWs had primary school education, while on the other hand, most CHWs in a Nigerian study37 had completed a basic national diploma.

Challenges experienced by community health workers

The review found three themes of challenges experienced by CHWs. These were individual-level, organisation-related and community-related challenges.

Individual-level challenges

At an individual level, the CHWs’ lack of knowledge and skills affected their ability to mitigate NCDs.

Inadequate knowledge and skills on non-communicable diseases

Studies38,39,40,41,43,45,47,48 included described inadequate knowledge, which made it difficult for CHWs to provide health education, and this lack of knowledge would culminate in poor skills in providing NCD care. In South Africa, Doresha and Mash broadly described the issue of a lack of skills in supporting the management of all NCDs.41 For example, the CHWs explained their inability to educate community members on insulin self-administration for diabetes care as they had not been trained.41 Other South African studies noted that despite training and having a manual, the CHWs often misinterpreted the therapeutic terms or modalities,40 and it was challenging to provide psychosocial care, as mental health was associated with multimorbidity.47 Likewise, Ethiopian participants explained that they had inadequate knowledge to answer hypertension-related questions from the community and lacked the skills to measure blood pressure.48 Mozambican CHWs also had inadequate knowledge in three areas: (1) believed in false treatments of epilepsy, (2) had inadequate knowledge of its causes, and (3) believed in some cultural treatments.39 Although CHWs did not have adequate knowledge on the three issues, Cumbe et al. note that, generally, CHWs had sufficient knowledge of epilepsy.39 In Uganda, even after dementia training, CHWs shared how they were still not proficient.43 Sometimes, the issue of poor skills was attributed to anxiety about performing a new task and would eventually resolve, with performance improving with continued service provision; however, in a few cases, CHWs’ performance may remain poor.45 Poor skill levels at the onset of providing a counselling intervention would only be resolved in the third or fifth session.38

Organisation-level challenges

Organisation-level challenges described in the reviewed articles emanated from the health facilities that supported the CHWs. These organisational challenges included referral problems, inadequate infrastructure and a lack of supervision.

Referral problems to and from health facilities

Two Ugandan studies,42,43 a South African study41 and a Nigerian study,37 described problems with the referral process. In South Africa, some primary healthcare facilities disregarded referrals made by CHWs who had screened patients for hypertension and diabetes.41 Sometimes, community members in South Africa would be referred to health centres, and they would not afford the transport costs.41 Similarly, in rural Uganda, CHWs noted how community members screened for COPD would not reach the health centres.42 One Ugandan CHW noted, ‘We expect the patients to reach the … clinic and they don’t’.42 Moreover, in Uganda and South Africa, referrals were problematic as the service required was unavailable at the clinics.41,43 In Nigeria, Ajisegri et al. also noted how CHWs would refer community members to district hospitals; however, there was no feedback about the referred patients, which compelled them to call community members for an update.37

Inadequate infrastructure and equipment in the health facilities

Another organisational challenge experienced by CHWs was the lack of working space and inadequate equipment.37,42,47,48 In a South African study, it was revealed that CHWs would improvise for working space, and consequently, patients would not know where to find them for follow-up mental health services.47 The lack of space was underscored when CHWs screened for COPD in the homes of community members in rural Uganda and found it difficult to maintain privacy with neighbours who were curious about the spirometry machine.42

Regarding the lack of equipment, a community-based hypertension screening intervention in Ethiopia lacked sphygmomanometers and stethoscopes from the health posts, which affected service delivery.48 Additionally, CHWs had to ‘improvise’ to measure blood pressure or blood glucose by sharing the sphygmomanometers between departments and asking patients to pay a fee for blood glucose testing.37

Lack of supervision

Three studies37,47,48 described the lack of supervision of CHWs. Teshome et al.48 found that five participants explained that supervision is essential for programme monitoring. Similarly, in South Africa, irregular and inadequate supervision were identified as a barrier to scaling up mental health service delivery.47 One South African CHW explained the issue of irregular supervision: ‘… they take a while to come back again’.47 These findings are also quantified in the Nigerian study, which found that 52.2% of CHWs reported that inadequate supervision was a challenge.37

Community-level challenges

Four community-level challenges were identified, namely a lack of trust in CHWs, concerns of neighbourhood crime, transport challenges and poverty among community members.

Mistrust of community health workers

Although CHWs broadly operate from the communities they come from, in some studies,42,49 there were challenges with community members trusting them. In rural Uganda, the CHWs reported that they were not trusted by the community, as they thought they were land grabbers.42 The Kenyan study reiterates this issue, highlighting how the community may perceive that their problems would not be kept in confidence when counselling is provided by CHWs.49 This lack of trust in CHWs also made it difficult to include family members who were deemed essential for the counselling intervention.49

Concerns of neighbourhood crime (safety)

In South Africa, two studies by Munodawafa et al.45 and Abrahams-Gessel36 described the issue of crime in the neighbourhoods from which CHWs operated. One South African CHW highlighted, ‘We saw skollies [thugs] when we were at the station and had to turn back’.45 Similarly, in Cape Town, CHWs who often wear uniforms stood out and were often targets of theft.36

Transport challenges in ensuring community access to services

In a rural Zimbabwean study, one of the barriers to ensuring community access to mental health services through the Friendship Bench initiative was the issue of transport.44 Kidia et al. explain that CHWs would often travel long distances in extreme weather and at times on foot.44 Similarly, in Kenya, CHWs also provided mental health services to elderly people and shared how they were unable to conduct home visits because of transport challenges.46

Poverty among community members

Community health workers who provided mental health interventions were affected by poverty described by community members.40,44,45,49 In the rural Zimbabwean study, some patients had to borrow money to access CHWs for mental health support.44 Similarly, South African CHWs felt helpless when faced with patients with material needs, and they were unable to offer such material assistance.40,45 Sometimes, there would be progress in mood improvement; however, this would be disrupted by an urgent financial challenge.40 The Kenyan study further described how it was difficult to provide a mental health intervention when community members experience financial challenges and cannot afford food.49

Implications and recommendations

This study sought to describe the task-sharing challenges faced by CHWs in Africa in NCD mitigation. The other objectives were to describe the contexts in which CHWs experienced these challenges and the characteristics of CHWs experiencing these challenges. The review found that most studies were conducted in rural contexts, focused on mental health conditions and reported that CHWs were predominantly female and had secondary school education. Task-sharing challenges experienced included inadequate knowledge and lack of skills, referral issues, inadequate infrastructure and equipment and lack of supervision. Community-level challenges were mistrust of CHWs, safety concerns from crime, transport challenges and poverty among community members.

The finding that inadequate knowledge and a lack of skills affected CHWs’ mitigation of NCDs parallels another scoping review24 conducted with studies selected globally, as well as another study conducted in Indonesia.25 The review by Thobane et al.24 also noted that most studies included described a lack of skill. Similarly, the Indonesian study25 notes that inadequate skills and knowledge are characterised by an inability to comprehend the terminology used in NCD management, lack of competency and misconceptions about some NCDs. To mitigate the lack of knowledge and skills in NCD management, continued support and training for CHWs should be provided. Innovative approaches across other LMICs are in the form of digital health technologies such as smartphone applications, which can be leveraged to assist CHWs.50 Digital health technologies, as indicated in the systematic review by Mishra et al.,51 may be used for training and as decision support systems in the management of mental health conditions.

The study also found that there are challenges with referrals made by CHWs. These referral challenges may depict the poor support systems for CHWs in the primary healthcare facilities described in a Nepalese study.52 Poor support from primary healthcare facilities also manifested through inadequate supervision. This finding also aligns with an Indonesian study, which noted how CHWs found poor supervision as a challenge in NCD management.23 This inadequate supervision may also reflect the broader issue of the health worker shortage3 with consequent inadequate capacity to supervise CHWs, often manifesting as competing responsibilities in providing clinical care and supervision.53 From this, it is recommended that primary healthcare systems ought to develop support systems for CHWs that also ensure adequate supervision, with consideration for the high workload faced by CHW supervisors. In this regard, digital health technologies can also be leveraged to support the supervision of CHWs and ensure quality NCD management.51

Some challenges highlighted in the review, such as a lack of equipment, a lack of transport and poverty in communities, also reflect on the broader challenges faced by some African healthcare workers, especially in marginalised rural contexts.54 For example, a study conducted in Zimbabwe notes that rural health facilities may lack ambulances and equipment and that patients may travel more than 5 km to access health services. This is also reflected in this study, where other socio-economic challenges impacted health service delivery. The impact of the socio-economic environment on African health systems may also explain their failures to meet the sustainable development goals (SDGs), in this case, SDG 3 of attaining good health and well-being by reducing premature mortality from NCDs.55 Notably, the lack of equipment and poor working conditions characteristic of many African health systems may also be a push factor in the brain drain of health workers,56 which worsens the health worker shortages, with consequent inadequate supervision of CHWs. To resolve this, African governments ought to address macroeconomic issues and support communities to deliver healthcare services. The support may include partnerships with not-for-profit organisations that are known to support CHW initiatives through training, financing and providing technical expertise.57 In addition, the study found that CHWs were affected by crime in the community. However, the issue was only described in studies conducted in South Africa. A previous study also notes the high levels of crime in South Africa,58 which could be a context-specific challenge. Given this, the findings may not truly depict the broader African context, limiting their applicability. Nevertheless, this may also reflect a research gap in other contexts, and we recommend further exploration of this challenge in countries outside South Africa to confirm whether this finding can be transferred to other African contexts.

Conclusion

The increase in NCDs in Africa, which requires an increase in the capacity of the health workforce, may be affected by poor patient outcomes when tasks are assigned to less qualified workers, such as CHWs. This review sought to describe the African task-sharing challenges experienced by CHWs in NCD mitigation. These challenges included individual-level issues, organisational challenges and problems in the community, such as poverty, lack of transport, crime and mistrust of CHWs. From this review, it is recommended that African governments consider supporting CHW programmes by addressing broader societal challenges such as transport, crime and poverty to support health service delivery. Moreover, primary healthcare facilities should have support systems that leverage digital health technologies for adequate and regular supervision and training of CHWs. Further research could explore safety concerns in the community when CHWs provide services in other African contexts outside South Africa. This study was limited by a lack of thematic saturation on this issue of safety concerns, as only South African studies highlighted the issue. In addition, the study was limited by the inclusion of most (64.3%) studies, which focused on mental health conditions, and this may affect the applicability of findings to other NCDs such as diabetes, hypertension, COPD and cancers. Therefore, it is recommended that future studies should explore the challenges CHWs experience in mitigating other NCDs. The study also excluded grey literature such as institutional reports, dissertations and conference proceedings, which limited the articles included in the study. Notwithstanding these limitations, the study’s main strength was the diversity of the African contexts represented, which enabled evidence synthesis.

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere gratitude to N.F., who assisted with reviewing articles. The authors are also grateful to the faculty members who assisted with data analysis.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Authors’ contributions

N.L.M. contributed to conceptualisation, methodology, writing original draft, review and formal analysis. S.A.M. contributed to the review of the original draft and supervision.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance to conduct this study was obtained from Walter Sisulu University Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee (No. WSU HREC 035/2025).

Funding information

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Data availability

Additional data supporting this review are available from the corresponding author, N.L.M., upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are the product of professional research. They do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency or that of the publisher. The authors are responsible for this article’s results, findings and content.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases [homepage on the Internet]. World Health Organization; 2024 [cited 2025 May 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases
  2. Bennett JE, Stevens GA, Mathers CD, et al. NCD Countdown 2030: Worldwide trends in non-communicable disease mortality and progress towards Sustainable Development Goal target 3.4. Lancet. 2018;392(10152):1072–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31992-5
  3. Asamani JA, Bediakon KSB, Boniol M, et al. Projected health workforce requirements and shortage for addressing the disease burden in the WHO Africa region, 2022–2030: A needs-based modelling study. BMJ Glob Health. 2024;7(Suppl. 1):e015972. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015972
  4. World Health Organization. Task sharing to improve access to family planning/contraception [homepage on the Internet]. World Health Organization; 2018 [cited 2025 Apr 07]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-RHR-17.20
  5. Ngcobo S, Scheepers S, Mbatha N, Grobler E, Rossouw T. Roles, barriers, and recommendations for community health workers providing community-based HIV care in sub-Saharan Africa: A review. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2022;36(4):130–144. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2022.0020
  6. Abdullateef RO, Esanju DO, Akintola AA, Salako OO, Akin-Ajani O. Community health workers’ commitment to HIV/AIDS control in Africa. J Med Surg Public Health. 2024;2:100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2023.100036
  7. Lukyamuzi Z, Nabisere RM, Nakalega R, et al. Community health workers improve HIV disclosure among HIV-affected sexual partners in rural Uganda: A quasi-experimental study. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022;10(5):e2100631. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00631
  8. Idriss-Wheeler D, Ormel I, Assefa M, et al. Engaging Community Health Workers (CHWs) in Africa: Lessons from the Canadian Red Cross supported programs. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024;4(1):e0002799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002799
  9. Hill J, Peer N, Oldenburg B, Kengne AP. Roles, responsibilities and characteristics of lay community health workers involved in diabetes prevention programmes: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0189069. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189069
  10. Paddick SM, Yoseph M, Gray WK, et al. Effectiveness of app-based cognitive screening for dementia by lay health workers in low resource settings. A validation and feasibility study in rural Tanzania. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2021;34(6):613–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891988720957105
  11. Limbani F, Thorogood M, Gómez-Olivé FX, Kabudula C, Goudge J. Task shifting to improve the provision of integrated chronic care: Realist evaluation of a lay health worker intervention in rural South Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(1):e001084. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001084
  12. Goudge J, Chirwa T, Eldridge S, et al. Can lay health workers support the management of hypertension? Findings of a cluster randomised trial in South Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(1):e000577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000577
  13. Gerber F, Gupta R, Lejone TI, et al. Community-based management of arterial hypertension and cardiovascular risk factors by lay village health workers for people with controlled and uncontrolled blood pressure in rural Lesotho: Joint protocol for two cluster-randomized trials within the ComBaCaL cohort study (ComBaCaL aHT Twic 1 and ComBaCaL aHT TwiC 2). Trials. 2024;25(1):365. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08226-2
  14. Glenton C, Javadi D, Perry HB. Community health workers at the dawn of a new era: 5. Roles and tasks. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(3):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00748-4
  15. Okoroafor SC, Christmals CD. Task shifting and task sharing implementation in Africa: A scoping review on rationale and scope. Healthcare. 2023;11(8): 1200. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11081200
  16. Inagaki Y, Matsushita K, Appel LJ, Perry HB, Neupane D. Task-sharing with community health workers to treat hypertension: A scoping review. J Hypertens. 2024;42(12): 2041. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003834
  17. Egbujie BA, Delobelle PA, Levitt N, Puoane T, Sanders D, Van Wyk B. Role of community health workers in type 2 diabetes mellitus self-management: A scoping review. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0198424. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198424
  18. Wright J, Chiwandira C. Building capacity for community mental health care in rural Malawi: Findings from a district-wide task-sharing intervention with village-based health workers. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2016;62(6):589–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764016657112
  19. Chibanda D, Weiss HA, Verhey R, et al. Effect of a primary care–based psychological intervention on symptoms of common mental disorders in Zimbabwe: A randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2016;316(24):2618–2626. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.19102
  20. Lund C, Schneider M, Garman EC, et al. Task-sharing of psychological treatment for antenatal depression in Khayelitsha, South Africa: Effects on antenatal and postnatal outcomes in an individual randomised controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 2019;130:103466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.103466
  21. Folz R, Ali M. Overview of community health worker programmes in Afghanistan, Egypt, and Pakistan. East Mediterr Health J. 2018;24(9):940–950. https://doi.org/10.26719/2018.24.9.940
  22. Chau LW, Murphy J, Nguyen VC, et al. Lay social workers implementing a task-sharing approach to managing depression in Vietnam. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021;15(1):52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-021-00478-8
  23. Surjaningrum ER, Minas H, Jorm AF, Kakuma R. The feasibility of a role for community health workers in integrated mental health care for perinatal depression: A qualitative study from Surabaya, Indonesia. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018;12(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-018-0208-0
  24. Thobane KF, Mulaudzi FM, Lavhelani NR, Gundo R. Enablers and barriers for task sharing of mental health care from nurses to community health workers: A scoping review. Int J Afr Nurs Sci. 2024;20:100761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2024.100761
  25. Fitryasari R, Marthoenis M, Warsini S, et al. Examining the challenges encountered by community health workers and empowering them to address mental health disorders: A qualitative study in Indonesia. Int J Nurs Sci. 2025;12(1):27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.12.003
  26. Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
  27. Westphaln KK, Regoeczi W, Masotya M, et al. From Arksey and O’Malley and beyond: Customizations to enhance a team-based, mixed approach to scoping review methodology. MethodsX. 2021;8:101375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101375
  28. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  29. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
  30. Nwagbara UI, Osuala EC, Chireshe R, et al. Mapping evidence on factors contributing to maternal and child mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol. PLoS One. 2022;17(8):e0272335. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272335
  31. Kahere M, Hlongwa M, Ginindza TG. A scoping review on the epidemiology of chronic low back pain among adults in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:2964. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052964
  32. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  33. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP – Qualitative studies [homepage on the Internet]. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme; 2023 [cited 2025 May 24]. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
  34. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP – Cross-sectional studies [homepage on the Internet]. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme; 2023 [cited 2025 Aug 02]. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
  35. Kleinheksel AJ, Rockich-Winston N, Tawfik H, Wyatt TR. Demystifying content analysis. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020;84(1): 7113. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7113
  36. Abrahams-Gessel S, Denman CA, Montano CM, et al. Training and supervision of community health workers conducting population-based, noninvasive screening for CVD in LMIC: Implications for scaling up. Glob Heart. 2015;10(1):39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gheart.2014.12.009
  37. Ajisegiri WS, Abimbola S, Tesema AG, Odusanya OO, Peiris D, Joshi R. ‘We just have to help’: Community health workers’ informal task-shifting and task-sharing practices for hypertension and diabetes care in Nigeria. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1038062. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1038062
  38. Bahar OS, Byansi W, Nabayinda J, et al. ‘I decided to participate … because I saw it as benefiting our community and families’: A qualitative study of lay providers’ experiences with delivering an evidence-based mental health intervention for families in Uganda. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2023;17(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-023-00593-8
  39. Cumbe VFJ, Greene C, Fumo AMT, et al. Community health workers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards Epilepsy in Sofala, Central Mozambique. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:15420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215420
  40. Davies T, Lund C, Schneider M. Implementation of a task-shared psychosocial intervention for perinatal depression in South Africa: A grounded theory process evaluation. SSM Mental Health. 2022;2:100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2021.100056
  41. Doresha LM, Williams, Mash R. The role of community health workers in non-communicable diseases in Cape Town, South Africa: Descriptive exploratory qualitative study. BMC Prim Care. 2024;25(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02424-2
  42. Ingenhoff R, Robertson N, Munana R, et al. Challenges to implementation of community health worker-led Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) screening and referral in Rural Uganda: A qualitative study using the implementation outcomes framework. Int J COPD. 2023;18:2769–2783. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S420137
  43. Karungi CK, Wakida EK, Rukundo GZ, Talib ZM, Haberer JE, Obua C. Lay health workers in community-based care and management of dementia: A qualitative ‘pre’ and ‘post’ intervention study in Southwestern Uganda. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022(1):9443229. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9443229
  44. Kidia K, Machando D, Dzoro V, et al. Rural friendship bench: A qualitative study in Zaka district, Zimbabwe. Soc Sci Med. 2024;348:116791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116791
  45. Munodawafa M, Lund C, Schneider M. A process evaluation exploring the lay counsellor experience of delivering a task shared psycho-social intervention for perinatal depression in Khayelitsha, South Africa. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1397-9
  46. Ojagbemi A, Daley S, Feeney Y, Gureje O. The care of older people with depression in Nigeria: Qualitative exploration of the experience of lay providers in primary care settings. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2024;39(9):e6147. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.6147
  47. Selohilwe O, Fairall L, Bhana A, et al. Challenges and opportunities for implementation and dissemination of a task- sharing counselling intervention for depression at primary health care level in South Africa. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2023;17(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-023-00575-w
  48. Teshome DF, Balcha SA, Ayele TA, et al. Perceived barriers and enablers influencing health extension workers toward home-based hypertension screening in rural northwest Ethiopia: Interpretive descriptive study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08523-z
  49. Wall JT, Kaiser BN, Friis-Healy EA, Ayuku D, Puffer ES. What about lay counselors’ experiences of task-shifting mental health interventions? Example from a family-based intervention in Kenya. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020;14(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00343-0
  50. Naslund JA, Shidhaye R, Patel V. Digital technology for building capacity of nonspecialist health workers for task sharing and scaling up mental health care globally. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2019;27(3):181–192. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000217
  51. Mishra SR, Lygidakis C, Neupane D, et al. Combating non-communicable diseases: Potentials and challenges for community health workers in a digital age, a narrative review of the literature. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34(1):55–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czy099
  52. Rawal LB, Kharel C, Yadav UN, et al. Community health workers for non-communicable disease prevention and control in Nepal: A qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e040350. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040350
  53. Geniets A, O’Donovan J, Hakimi L, Winters N. Training for community health: Bridging the global health care gap. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2021.
  54. Mangundu M, Roets L, Janse van Rensburg E. A strategic action plan to enhance the accessibility of healthcare in rural areas of Zimbabwe. Glob Public Health. 2023;18(1):2234982. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2023.2234982
  55. World Health Organization. Targets of Sustainable Development Goal 3 [homepage on the Internet]. World Health Organization; 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 31]. Available from: https://www.who.int/europe/about-us/our-work/sustainable-development-goals/targets-of-sustainable-development-goal-3
  56. Leitão CA, De Oliveira Salvador GL, Idowu BM, Dako F. Drivers of global health care worker migration. J Am Coll Radiol. 2024;21(8):1188–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.03.005
  57. Sanadgol A, Doshmangir L, Majdzadeh R, Gordeev VS. Engagement of non-governmental organisations in moving towards universal health coverage: A scoping review. Glob Health. 2021;17(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00778-1
  58. Obagbuwa IC, Abidoye AP. South Africa crime visualization, trends analysis, and prediction using machine learning linear regression technique. Appl Comput Intell Soft Comput. 2021;2021(1):5537902. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5537902


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.