Review Article
Publication practices and responsible authorship: A review article
Journal of Public Health in Africa | Vol 8, No 1 | a985 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2017.723
| © 2024 Elvis E. Tarkang, Margaret Kweku, Francis B. Zotor
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 22 November 2024 | Published: 23 June 2017
Submitted: 22 November 2024 | Published: 23 June 2017
About the author(s)
Elvis E. Tarkang, Department of Population and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana; and, HIV/AIDS Prevention Research Network, Kumba, CameroonMargaret Kweku, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ghana
Francis B. Zotor, Family and Community Health, Schoolof Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ghana
Full Text:
PDF (706KB)Abstract
Dissemination of research findings through the publication of one’s work or a group of contributors is an important part of the research process, as this allows the passing on of benefits to a much wider community. In whatever evocative form this dissemination may take, the onus lies on the author(s) to ensure adherence to the code of ethics as it pertains to the integrity of the information being put out. We publish because we want our findings to be adapted into practice and application, or in some cases may be relevant to policy makers in decision-making. To a large extent in the field of academia, successful publication improves opportunities for academic funding and promotion whilst enhancing scientific and scholarly achievement and repute. A situation may be compromised where intellectual contributions to a scientific investigation do not adhere to the four key guidelines of scholarship, authorship, approval and agreement as well as the protocols of ensuring good publication ethics. The objective of this review is to lay emphasis on universal standards for manuscript authorship and to fostering good practices. This in our view will bring authorship credit and accountability to the attention of our colleagues and readers at large. To achieve this, a systematic and critical review of the literature was undertaken. Electronic databases, academic journals and books from various sources were accessed. Several key search terms relating to responsible authorship, common authorship malpractices, conflict of interest, universal publication guidelines and other authorship related issues, were used. Only references deemed useful from relevant texts and journal articles were included. In this paper, the authors have sought to highlight the pitfalls researchers sometimes entangle themselves within an act of compromise thereby impinging on the ethical and professional responsibilities for the content of a paper under consideration. This article presents the case that authorship has a strong currency that brings not only personal satisfaction but also career rewards based on publication counting. In all cases described here, a universal standard for manuscript authorship will be critical in fostering good practices. As you write and review manuscripts, keep these good practices in mind, and consider ways to bring authorship credit and accountability to the attention of your colleagues and readers.
Keywords
responsible authorship; common publication practice; conflict of interest; universal publication guidelines
Metrics
Total abstract views: 176Total article views: 46
Crossref Citations
1. Authorship transparency and equity in otolaryngology and maxillofacial surgery: current practices and the potential impact of large language models
Andrea Frosolini, Simone Benedetti, Paolo Gennaro, Guido Gabriele
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology year: 2024
doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-09151-5