Health economics in Africa from 1991 to 2020: A systematic review
Accepted: 20 April 2022
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
This systematic review was conducted to identify, evaluate and characterize the overall progress of health economics research conducted for Africa. Health economics studies carried out from 1991 to 2020 for Africa were retrieved from the EconLit database using relevant searching strategies. According to the methodology of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, qualified journal papers were included. Using bibliometrics, we ran a series of analyses on authorship, studied countries, affiliations, and countries of origin, journals, and research topics. A total of 2935 studies were screened, and 178 were included in this review. We observed that the determinants of illness is the most researched topics. The United States, World Bank, University of California Berkeley, are respectively the most influential countries, world organizations, and academic institutions in the field of health economics of Africa. HIV/AIDs is still the leading health issue in highly cited health economics studies in Africa. Health Policy and Planning is the most productive and academically influential journal, and Kenya is the most studied country by health economists among all African countries. African health systems are vulnerable compared to developed countries, as many of them are underfunded. The academic strength in Africa is much weaker than that of leading health economics counties. Even within the continent, the academic development and the attention it receives are uneven. More influential health economics studies of Africa should be published in addition to the disease focus of HIV/AIDS.
Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP. Introduction: the state and scope of health economics. In: Handbook of health economics. Elsevier; 2000. p. 1–8.
Jakovljevic MM, Ogura S. Health economics at the crossroads of centuries–from the past to the future. Front Publ Health 2016;4:115.
Wagstaff A, Culyer AJ. Four decades of health economics through a bibliometric lens. J Health Econ 2012;31:406–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.03.002
Nations U. World population prospects 2019: highlights. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2019.
IMF IMF. World Economic Outlook (April 2021) - Real GDP growth [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDP_RPCH@WEO
Bank W. Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2020: Reversals of Fortune. The World Bank; 2020.
Labour SA, Trust SAMS. The Economics of Health Care in Southern Africa: A Review Article. Social Dynamics 1978;4:109–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02533957808458224
Gavaza P, Rascati K, Brown C, et al. The state of health economic and pharmacoeconomic evaluation research in Zimbabwe: a review. Curr Ther Res 2008;69:268–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.curtheres.2008.06.005
Gavaza P, Rascati KL, Oladapo AO, Khoza S. The state of health economic evaluation research in Nigeria. Pharmacoeconomics 2010;28:539–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11536170-000000000-00000
Gavaza P, Rascati KL, Oladapo AO, Khoza S. The state of health economic research in South Africa. Pharmacoeconomics 2012;30:925–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11589450-000000000-00000
Hernandez-Villafuerte K, Li R, Hofman KJ. Bibliometric trends of health economic evaluation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Globaliz Health 2016;12:1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0188-2
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
Wang Q, Waltman L. Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus. J Informetrics 2016;10:347–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.003
Kosnik L. A survey of JEL codes: What do they mean and are they used consistently? J Econ Surv 2018;32:249–72.
Rubin RM, Chang CF. A bibliometric analysis of health economics articles in the economics literature: 1991‐2000. Health Econ 2003;12:403–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.802
Martín-Martín A, Thelwall M, Orduna-Malea E, López-Cózar ED. Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics 2021;126:871–906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4
Nicolaisen J. Citation analysis. Ann Rev Informat Sci Technol 2007;41:609–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410120
Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2005;102:16569–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
Braun T, Glänzel W, Schubert A. A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics 2006;69:169–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0147-4
The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2019 [Internet]. NobelPrize.org. [cited 2021 Apr 17]. Available from: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2019/press-release/
Glewwe P. Why does mother’s schooling raise child health in developing countries? Evidence from Morocco. J Hum Res 1999;124–59.
Alderman H, Hoddinott J, Kinsey B. Long term consequences of early childhood malnutrition. Oxford Econ Papers 2006;58:450–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpl008
Young A. The gift of the dying: The tragedy of AIDS and the welfare of future African generations. Quart J Econ 2005;120:423–66.
Yamano T, Jayne TS. Measuring the impacts of working-age adult mortality on small-scale farm households in Kenya. World Devel 2004;32:91–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.07.004
Arndt C, Lewis JD. The macro implications of HIV/AIDS in South Africa: a preliminary assessment. South Afr J Econ 2000;68:380–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1813-6982.2000.tb01283.x
Miguel E, Kremer M. Worms: identifying impacts on education and health in the presence of treatment externalities. Econometrica 2004;72:159–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00481.x
Kremer M, Miguel E. The illusion of sustainability. Quart J Econ 2007;122:1007–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.3.1007
Kremer M, Leino J, Miguel E, Zwane AP. Spring cleaning: Rural water impacts, valuation, and property rights institutions. Quart J Econ 2011;126:145–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjq010
Björkman M, Svensson J. Power to the people: evidence from a randomized field experiment on community-based monitoring in Uganda. Quart J Econ 2009;124:735–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.735
Dupas P. Do teenagers respond to HIV risk information? Evidence from a field experiment in Kenya. Am Econ J Appl Econ 2011;3:1–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/app.3.1.1
Easterly W. Can the west save Africa? J Econ Liter 2009;47:373–447.
Meenakshi JV, Johnson NL, Manyong VM, et al. How cost-effective is biofortification in combating micronutrient malnutrition? An ex ante assessment. Wrld Develop 2010;38:64–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.03.014
Kernick D. Economic evaluation in health: a thumb nail sketch. Bmj 1998;316:1663–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7145.1663
WHO. HIV/AIDs. 2021. Available from: https://www.afro.who.int/health-topics/hivaids [cited 2021 Apr 5].
James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet 2018;392:1789–858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7
Copyright (c) 2022 Xiao Meng, Gang Mu, Jiaxuan Tong
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.