The reaction of secondary school and university students toward COVID-19-induced lockdown
Accepted: 3 June 2022
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Background: The Coronavirus pandemic triggered a worldwide partial lockdown. The lockdown instigated the school’s shutdown making the students follow their courses in the virtual modalities while staying at home.
Methods: The data were collected using an online survey using a semi-structured questionnaire. The study involved anonymous as well as voluntary 77 secondary schools (Grades 9th to 12th) and 132 university students (class standing 1st to 5th year).
Results: The lockdown introduced excruciating experiences for most of the students; however, it also created unanticipated opportunities to learn new skills and develop insights on how to mitigate unforeseen crises while remaining reasonably productive. The steps taken to reduce exposure to the coronavirus infection showed a gender discrepancy. Accordingly, males were disproportionately taken risks regardless of the curfew imposed, while females were deeply concerned about the lockdown-induced break of social connections. Students who were attending public schools, presumably from low-income families were found to be more productive during the lockdown compared to their private school counterparts. This shows that, in some instances, the Coronavirus pandemic is a blessing in disguise. The lockdown created mixed feelings; accordingly, the students reported significantly varied responses towards it. This also introduced some inconsistencies in the response of the students. Perceptions about the lockdown and its impact in most instances significantly varied among students, which unlocked the opportunities to learn new lessons on how to manage unprecedented crises.
Conclusion: Policymakers need to take into account gender and living standard while developing strategies to mitigate unprecedented challenges.
Lai CC, Shih TP, Ko WC, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrobe Agents 2020;55;105924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105924
Desta TT. Lifestyles and living standard disparities in the pandemicity of COVID-19 in the Global North versus the Global South Countries. Geriatr Care 2020;6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/gc.2020.9025
Desta TT, Mulugeta T. Living with COVID-19-triggered pseudoscience and conspiracies. Int J Public Health 2020;65;713-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01412-4
Forni G, Mantovani A. COVID-19 vaccines: where we stand and challenges ahead. Cell Death Differ 2021;28;626-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-020-00720-9
Qian M, Jiang J. COVID-19 and social distancing. J Public Health 2020;1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01321-z
Hall S, Border S. Online neuroanatomy education and its role during the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) lockdown. World Neurosurg 2020;139;628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.001
Mulugeta T, Tadesse E, Shegute T, Desta TT. COVID-19: socio-economic impacts and challenges in the working group. Heliyon 2021;e07307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07307
Alruwais N, Wills G, Wald M. Advantages and challenges of using e-assessment. Int J Inf Educ Technol 2018;8;34-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.1.1008
Sahu P. Closure of universities due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): impact on education and mental health of students and academic staff. Cureus 2020;12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7541
NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People). Ten Equity Implications of the Coronavirus COVID-19 Outbreak in the United States. Available from: https://eastsideforall.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Ten-Equity-Considerations-of-the-Coronavirus-COVID-19-Outbreak-in-the-United-States-FINAL.pdf. Accessed on 08 July 2021.
Wagner A, Matulewska A, Marusek S. Pandemica panoptica: Biopolitical management of viral spread in the age of covid-19. Int J Semiot Law 2021;1-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09821-1
IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp 2015
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2016; Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.
Dodson L, Dickert J. Girls’ family labor in low‐income households: A decade of qualitative research. J Marriage Fam 2004;66;318-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.0005.x
Al-Qaisy LM. Adjustment of college freshmen: The importance of gender and the place of residence. Int J Psychol Stud 2010;2;142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v2n1p142
Fajans J. Autonomy and relatedness: Emotions and the tension between individuality and sociality. Crit Anthropol 2006;26;103-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X06061486
Oreffice S, Quintana-Domeque C. Gender inequality in COVID-19 times: Evidence from UK Prolific participants. J Demogr Econ 2021;87(2);261-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2021.2
Sapadin LA. Friendship and gender: Perspectives of professional men and women. J Soc Pers Relat 1988;5(4);387-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407588054001
Trobst KK, Collins RL, Embree JM. The role of emotion in social support provision: Gender, empathy and expressions of distress. J Soc Pers Relat 1994;11(1);45-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407594111003
Stark R. Physiology and faith: Addressing the “universal” gender difference in religious commitment. J Sci Study Relig2002;41;495-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5906.00133
Ellis L, Hoskin AW, Ratnasingam M. Testosterone, risk taking, and religiosity: Evidence from two cultures. J Sci Study Relig 2016;55;153-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12248
Leaper C, Friedman CK. The Socialization of Gender. In: Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Research. Edited by Joan E. Grusec and Paul D. Hastings 2007;561-587.
Copyright (c) 2023 the Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.