Program evaluation as an important practical implication of Van Howe and Storm’s paper

Mpho Selemogo

doi:10.4081/jphia.2011.e32

Program evaluation as an important practical implication of Van Howe and Storm’s paper

https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2011.e32

PDF HTML

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2011)

Submitted: 24 March 2011
Accepted: 23 June 2011

Published: 5 September 2011

circumcision, program evaluation

Abstract Views: 963

PDF: 497
HTML: 109

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Mpho Selemogo
mphogift@yahoo.com
University of Botswana, Botswana.

Van Howe and Storm’s paper is commended for asking valid questions regarding the scientific evidence upon which circumcision as an HIV prevention strategy is based. The paper however gives no real practical suggestions as to what the way forward should be regarding the already rolled out circumcision programs in Africa. This contribution seeks to highlight the importance of rigorous program evaluation as a critical practical implication of the paper and a way forward for such programs.

Mpho Selemogo, University of Botswana

BMedSci, MBBS, MA(ethics). Public Health Medicine trainee, University of Botswana School of Medicine

Selemogo, M. (2011). Program evaluation as an important practical implication of Van Howe and Storm’s paper. Journal of Public Health in Africa, 2(2), e32. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2011.e32